Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Iranian's are funny.

jack

The Legendary Troll King
Iran's foreign minister questioned the right of Israel to exist yesterday at the opening of a provocative conference on the Holocaust. The two-day gathering in Teheran is being attended by dozens of international guests, including a British anti-Zionist rabbi, who will hear presentations debating the use of the gas chambers.


The Teheran conference was attended by six members of Jews United Against Zionism. Some wore badges that had Israel’s flag crossed out


In opening remarks, Manouchehr Mottaki said: "If the official version of the Holocaust is thrown into doubt, then the identity and nature of Israel will be thrown into doubt. If... it is proved that the Holocaust was a historical reality, then what is the reason for the Palestinians having to pay the cost of the Nazis' crimes?"

The conference, Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision, was initiated by Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, who has described the killing of six million Jews in Nazi Germany as a "myth" and called for Israel to be wiped off the map. His remarks have caused grave international alarm at a time that Iran is feared to be developing nuclear weapons.

In an address broadcast to the nation yesterday, Mr Ahmadinejad questioned why the West would not allow "any investigation" into the Holocaust. He is expected to address the meeting today.

Earlier in the day the president faced the first protest since winning elections 18 months ago. Students lit a firework and burned his photograph in the audience as he delivered a speech at the Amir Kabir technical university.

advertisementUp to 60 protesters chanted "death to the dictator", the Islamic Republic News Agency reported. The president's supporters in the audience then shouted back, before his speech continued. There were no reports of arrests.

Israel, the United States and a leader of Iran's own 25,000-strong Jewish community condemned the Teheran meeting, which is believed to be the first of its kind sponsored by a state. Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister, called it a "sick phenomenon that shows the depth of the hatred of the fundamentalist Iranian regime".

"The enlightened world must condemn this conference and the one who has convened it in the most determined manner," he said en route to Berlin to attend a conference where historians affirmed the accuracy of Nazi genocide data.

Among the participants in the Teheran conference were six members of Jews United Against Zionism, who were dressed in the traditional long black coats and hats of Orthodox Jews. Some wore badges with Israel's flag crossed out.

One of two rabbis in the contingent was Ahron Cohen, from London. He said: "We came here to put the Orthodox Jewish viewpoint. We certainly say there was a Holocaust... but in no way can it be used as a justification for perpetrating unjust acts against the Palestinians." Rabbi Cohen is a member of Neturei Karta (Guardians of the City), a small global anti-Zionist movement which holds that the state of Israel cannot exist until the coming of the Messiah.

Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said: "They are a fringe, but a fringe that detractors of Israel are making much of. The conference sits with Iran's agenda of demonising Israel, and linking Israel's existence to nothing more than a guilt trip of the Western powers."

The Iranians claimed that 67 foreigners visited from 30 countries. They included the American David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, and the French writer Georges Thiel, who has been convicted in France for spreading revisionist theories about the mass extermination of Jews.

Many Iranians have admitted being embarrassed about the meeting, which followed Iran's decision to hold a competition for cartoons about the Holocaust in October. There are also elements within the Teheran establishment that are aware that it will only increase Iran's international isolation when it is also at odds with the United Nations over its nuclear programme.
 
Not even real jewish men?
wiran12.jpg
 
Ah David Duke was there. Wasn't he considered a serious Republican candidate before his past got the best of him?
 
I fully admit to being an anti-semite.

I fucking hate arab muslim scum.

most kikes are ashkenazi though - that makes them "pretend" joos since they are 100% caucasians and descended from Crimean slavs.

You may not be a joo, but your pic sure does look like a pedophile!
 
That's what's even funnier. Those aren't my pics either.

Which is the final stage of the Legal Action Troll for anyone that chopped that particular series of pics :D I wasn't kidding when I asked Edna nicely.
 
Iran - existed since 2700BC
Israel - 1948

but the fact David Duke and Georges Theil were there shows what kind of bullshit was being preached
 
Israel has existed since long before 2700BC and Iran has not existed in continuity since then - just like Israel. Both have been conquered several times, died and revived throughout their history.

Are we forgetting the Babylonians also phased with the Medes(Persians)? Were conquered all to shit by the Assyrian Empire? Were crushed by the Greeks? Were kicked to shit by the Romans and even the Parthians?

Someone needs to stop swallowing all the revisionist history they read.
 
headvoid said:
but the fact David Duke and Georges Theil were there shows what kind of bullshit was being preached
"At the suggestion of the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran is hosting a conference in Tehran dealing with the Holocaust on December 11 and 12, with over 67 scholars in attendance from 30 countries of the world.

The conference will include academics who embrace the prevalent historical conception of the Holocaust and those who have a revisionist view. Revisionists question parts of the official Holocaust story. In some Western nations, to diverge even slightly from Holocaust orthodoxy will cause an historian to face not only a loss of academic career, but also imprisonment.

The main theme of the Holocaust Conference is that there must be freedom of speech on this subject as on all others. Free speech, inquiry and debate is the only way to learn the truth on any issue. Many Western governments have imprisoned many academics for simply expressing their historical opinions on the Holocaust.

For instance, world-renowned historian David Irving at this moment sits in a prison near Vienna, Austria for simply stating his historical opinion about Auschwitz in a lecture in Austria in 1989. German researcher/chemist Germar Rudolf faces years of imprisonment for simply publishing a forensic analysis that challenged the authenticity of alleged Auschwitz gas chambers.

In prosecutions of Holocaust questioners, authorities have not allowed introduction of any evidence supporting their claims. The courts have even announced in their guilty verdicts that “The truth is no defense” (i.e. that even if the defendant can be shown to be honest and accurate, and even if his claims can be substantiated by physical and documentary evidence, he has broken the law by simply questioning aspects of the official Holocaust Story).

I and Davidduke.com take no hard position on the historical accuracy of the Holocaust. Obviously, Jews, as well as other nationalities suffered great losses during the Second World War.

Repression, dispossession or murder against any group is wrong.

It must also be understood that throughout history, the historical treatment of atrocities or crimes against humanity have often been colored by political purposes. Throughout history some crimes against humanity have been exaggerated and emphasized to justify war or other political agendas. Other crimes against humanity have been completely ignored or downplayed.

An example is the contrast between the crimes of National Socialist Germany and that of Soviet Communism. Most researchers readily acknowledge that Bolshevism imprisoned, tortured and slaughtered many times more people in Russia and in Eastern Europe than even the high numbers alleged in the Holocaust. Yet, the Soviet Holocaust receives not one-hundredth of the attention of the Jewish Holocaust.

Some revisionists suggest that this disparity is because of the strong Jewish influence in Western media-- from the entertainment establishment of Hollywood to the news media centered in New York and across the European world. They suggest that an exaggeration and saturation of the Holocaust has been essential to the establishment and ongoing Western support for the Zionist state in Israel, and that it offers a psychological excuse for the large scale ethnic cleansing, repression, torture and genocide against the Palestinian people by the Israelis.

Revisionists argue that this vested interest of much of the pro-Zionist media and pro-Zionist governments affords a danger that the Holocaust can be distorted and politicized, just as many historical crimes against humanity have either been exaggerated or diminished in pursuit of political agendas.

We at Davidduke.com believe in freedom of speech on all historical and contemporary issues.

We believe in freedom of speech, conscience, opinion, and expression.

Freedom of speech is important for two reasons.

First, freedom of speech is a vital human right. It is the cornerstone of all other rights, because without freedom of speech no one has to the right to even freely know and learn of the abrogation of other rights affecting human freedom and survival. That is why the American founding fathers put freedom of speech, press and religion as the first and highest of the Bill of Rights.

Second, freedom of speech and debate are absolutely vital for the truth to prevail. If one side of any controversial issue can suppress the voice of opposition, we cannot arrive at the certainty of any truth. If academics and citizens can have their careers jeopardized an be monetarily blackmailed; if they can be threatened with firings, loss of income, or imprisonment, for simply sincerely pursuing an historical inquiry and publishing it, how can the truth be fairly arrived at?

How does one even know the real revisionist opinion, if that opinion is repressed?

A perfect example of the bias treatment of the Western press in regard to Holocaust revisionism is the recent adoption of the term “Holocaust denier” to slander anyone who may question any part of the complex and expansive Holocaust story. The term “Holocaust denier” was created by Simon Wiesenthal to denote any one who dares to question any parts of his version of the Holocaust. To “Deny” is usually associated with an allegation of a personal crime. For example, “John Doe denies that he committed the robbery.” It has a very negative connotation. It is not commonly used to denote people holding a contrary historical opinion.

In truth, revisionists are not deniers, they are simply questioners who are being imprisoned and slandered for simply questioning with research and reason this tragic period of history during the Second World War.

To question is respected in the West, so it reveals the bias of the media when historians who question some aspects of the Holocaust are called "deniers" rather than questioners. In some ways, the term "denier" is also similar to charges made against religious dissenters during the age of the inquisition. The religious courts labeled the accused heretics as "deniers", not men of conscience and questions. The Holocaust has achieved an almost religious status in the West whereby to simply question even the smallest detail of its approved mass-media version, is to invite scorn and imprisonment similar to that accorded to religious heretics in the Middle Ages.

The Holocaust Conference in Iran is truly about respect for intellectual freedom.

Iran has organized the first international conference dedicated to freedom of speech and inquiry on this important historical matter that has so many ramifications on the Mideast and many other present political realities.

I am here in Tehran as speaker in this conference because I am dedicated to freedom of speech, conscience, and thought.
"

bullshit-726702.jpg
 
I think it's laughable that one of the people invited to that little 'the holocaust never happened' conference happened to be the former Grand Dragon of the KKK. He was INVITED by the IRANIANS and given a suite and a position of honor at the conference. If we need any further proof that these guys are morons, that's it.
 
If Jews are living in Iran (I believe there are small enclaves here and there) they're paying the jizyah and are thus exempt from being murdered.

Nothing like being a slave.
 
Paying the Jizyat and having no legal rights and feeling oneself subdued by the muslims is small price to pay for infidels to live in peace and harmony amongst the superior muslims.

The English will be doing that soon. The French already are.
 
Top