Lord Raffles
New member
Homos.
Lord Raffles said:
Homos.
SaintLucifer said:In order that you may determine that Star Trek is indeed gay, you would have been an avid viewer of the same. Watched every single episode did you? I thought as much.
Lord Raffles said:Don't be such a pathetic determinist - one does not become by default an 'avid star trek viewer' purely by recognizing modern cultural objects. But don't for a second assume that makes me an 'avid devotee' of Donald Davidson, which I feel is important for plebeians such as yourself to understand first and foremost, before you spew forth yet further second-rate ideas and concepts in the name of some autistic 'victory', of which your feeble and tired brain is incapable of articulating, contemplating, and above all understanding. You’ll have to learn fast, dearest Luci, that great moments of human endeavour stimulate a sort of poetry ... the mundane minds of fools such as yourself are shaken from the attics to the basement... earthquakes of phraseology... the sudden discovery of THE STYLE OF ROME... Read every single word did you? I thought as much.
Sarek said:I’ve heard the same thing about the Canadian Mounties.
SaintLucifer said:
Your message board incompetence is an inspiration to botched lobotomy patients everywhere. I suggest you hone your writing skills before applying borrowed glories as a mere typist.
The Anti-Moron™ software on my PC went crazy when I started to read your post. Are you always this ignorant, or are you making a special effort today? Anyway, who was talking to you or even taking you under consideration? How true is Stanislaw J. Lec's famous remark: "Every now and then you meet someone whose ignorance is encyclopedic."
You have that certain nothing. Truly, you are about as interesting as watching a slug move slowly across a large rock. I'd get more pleasure from running my nostrils down a cactus, than reading another contribution from you. Maybe you wouldn't read like such a pathetic loser if you weren't so stupid that even single-celled organisms out score you in IQ tests; if your weren't so fat that your clothes come in three sizes: Extra Large, Jumbo, and Oh-My-God-It's-Coming-Towards-Us!, or if you didn't have a face that people rub tree branches on to make ugly sticks. Who am I kidding? You would.
In closing, why don't you put your glasses on backwards and walk into yourself?
Lord Raffles said:Too scared to argue?
I gurantee you use insult generators - your insults are just too generic.
I gurantee you use insult generators - your insults are just too generic.
jack said:No one has the slightest clue what you are talking about.
SaintLucifer said:
Exactly correct! I did so to prove a point. That was the first time I ever used one. I recognised the style of your post and immediately found others using the same. I would suggest you refrain in future from passing on other's words as your own.
Did you notice how quickly you noticed that post was generated by an insult generator? I noticed the same about your post. I hope the message is clear. The fact my point flew right over your head does not surprise me in the slightest.
Lord Raffles said:Care to point in exact detail what that point was exactly?
SaintLucifer said:
Interestingly enough, my very same post did just that. You mean to say you missed it AGAIN? Oh lordy lordy lordy! Stupidity reigns in your family does it not? I would suggest you read my post yet again. Slllloooowwwwwwllllyyyyyy.
I still don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Shall we try for the 1000 range?SaintLucifer said:Exactly as I expected. For one to have a clue as to what it is I am saying, one requires an extra digit added to their double-digit IQs.