Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stardestroyer.net Episode III: Revenge Of The RDJ

The Question

The Question

Eternal
Illegal Immigration! Summary Executions! Mal Reynolds! SD.Netters trolling the new members! SHOCKING!

Now if I can just figure out attachments...
 
The way I reckon it, now SD.Net and I are even for the shenannigans they pulled, raising 'Raoul Duke, Jr.' from the dead and parading the corpse around, so to speak.

Sick, pompous fucks.

Hold up a tick -- after I post the threads where I bitchslap Mike Wong and SirNitram in debate, then we'll be even. ;)
 
The Question said:
Hold up a tick -- after I post the threads where I bitchslap Mike Wong and SirNitram in debate, then we'll be even. ;)
Click to expand...
As far as accomplishments go, that's not really much. I could do that after a six pack of hard cider, a bottle of cheap wine, and a flask of decent brandy.

Honestly, though, I think you made their day.

"Ohmigod it's someone from teh TK! BANZ0RED! YAY! We are t3h 1337, fishes."

But I have to say, some nice moments there... classic Wong:
Some people think that "logical argument" means "play nice and don't get on my case for failing to produce evidence to support my claims".
Click to expand...
... as ever, the dude thinks that ad hominems and other rhetorical devices are an appropriate logical argumentative technique. Although, really...
It sure as hell didn't look like a place where arguments are won through bullying.
Click to expand...
TQ, you were laying on the flattery really thick there. I'm surprised they bought it that long.

Just goes to show how deluded the community there is. And you gotta love how Wikipedia is a <i>such</i> a sore point with them... they won't accept anyone citing it, even when it's something as readily verifiable (per, incidentally, Wikipedia's verifiability policy) as a list of undeclared wars.
 
TJHairball said:
Although, really...TQ, you were laying on the flattery really thick there. I'm surprised they bought it that long.
Click to expand...

I'm not. Appealing to their massive egos has always worked. :)
 
The Question said:
I'm not. Appealing to their massive egos has always worked. :)
Click to expand...
True.

Finally added the bit about Wikipedia onto the quiz, along with some tentative images. Perhaps I should've put a "NO WIKIPEDIA" sign (ala no smoking) on the SW one, given how sore they still are about being snubbed by the Wikicommunity.
 
TJHairball said:
True.

Finally added the bit about Wikipedia onto the quiz, along with some tentative images. Perhaps I should've put a "NO WIKIPEDIA" sign (ala no smoking) on the SW one, given how sore they still are about being snubbed by the Wikicommunity.
Click to expand...

Oh, is that what their real problem was with Wikipedia? Oh, that's just hilarious! :rofl:
 
The Question said:
Oh, is that what their real problem was with Wikipedia? Oh, that's just hilarious! :rofl:
Click to expand...
Yuppers. I noted the occasion here, and I should say they seem to have only gotten more bitter about it. Something of a persecution complex in operation there. They keep insisting they deserve a Wikipedia article, and the article was remade/reposted several times after being VFD'd, which made it a speedy-delete on sight, and SDN board non grata among Wikipedians.
 
In other words, they were made to take what they routinely dish out, and they can't stomach the taste of their own medicine. Priceless!
 
LOL. I just wouldn't play around with their logic games. I stated a position on Star Wars canon and they debated for 6 paragraphs why they were right. I just said I was, and when they asked why, I said because.
 
DarthSikle said:
LOL. I just wouldn't play around with their logic games. I stated a position on Star Wars canon and they debated for 6 paragraphs why they were right. I just said I was, and when they asked why, I said because.
Click to expand...

In other words, you played their logic games precisely as they do, only you didn't try to use logical fallacies hoping they'd be too noob to pick them out.
 
The Question said:
Well, that can't be right... after all, if they ban for stupidity, the board should have been taken down completely years ago.
Click to expand...
If you agree with them, you're allowed a few thousand posts first.

Btw, really fixed quiz now. Quizilla has a crappy editing engine and ate the changes, which are now visible. Shiiiny.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top