Friday
Bazinga!
Various and sundry bits of verbiage encountered whilst attempting to educate today's youth:
Student: "I'm glad Obama won. I get to keep my foodstamps." (Indicative of the popular attitude at my place of employment)
Language Arts Teacher: "This is going to be the Social Justice Unit".
Excuse me? The WHAT unit? You are licensed to teach language arts, not to indoctrinate. This is why most of your students are failing your course, Chickie (they actually are). Concentrate more on teaching them to critically interpret a piece of literature, and less on twisting that piece of literature to fit your agenda.
Speaking of which....
This same teacher gave O Henry's "After 20 Years" as a reading assignment. The story is about these two friends who haven't seen each other in 20 years, meeting up at a predetermined rendezvous. One of the friends becomes a cop, the other a criminal. The cop recognizes the criminal from wanted posters. The criminal does not recognize the cop. The cop cannot turn his old friend in, so he sends a colleague in his place, along with a note of apology to the criminal. Very twisty ending, very much O Henry.
One of the questions in her assignment was: Who was the antagonist in this story? The answer is, of course, the criminal, for not taking the right path in life.
A lot of her students said the cop was the antagonist, and the teacher insisted on accepting that answer. Why? She claimed "cultural bias." In her culture, the cop would be labelled a "snitch", and would be outcast from the community.
Bullshit. The cop was just doing his duty, and lived his life on the side of right. No antagonistic characteristics there at all. It took all of the willpower I could muster to just sit in that classroom and not speak my mind.
Number_6 would have blown a gasket.
Student: "I'm glad Obama won. I get to keep my foodstamps." (Indicative of the popular attitude at my place of employment)
Language Arts Teacher: "This is going to be the Social Justice Unit".
Excuse me? The WHAT unit? You are licensed to teach language arts, not to indoctrinate. This is why most of your students are failing your course, Chickie (they actually are). Concentrate more on teaching them to critically interpret a piece of literature, and less on twisting that piece of literature to fit your agenda.
Speaking of which....
This same teacher gave O Henry's "After 20 Years" as a reading assignment. The story is about these two friends who haven't seen each other in 20 years, meeting up at a predetermined rendezvous. One of the friends becomes a cop, the other a criminal. The cop recognizes the criminal from wanted posters. The criminal does not recognize the cop. The cop cannot turn his old friend in, so he sends a colleague in his place, along with a note of apology to the criminal. Very twisty ending, very much O Henry.
One of the questions in her assignment was: Who was the antagonist in this story? The answer is, of course, the criminal, for not taking the right path in life.
A lot of her students said the cop was the antagonist, and the teacher insisted on accepting that answer. Why? She claimed "cultural bias." In her culture, the cop would be labelled a "snitch", and would be outcast from the community.
Bullshit. The cop was just doing his duty, and lived his life on the side of right. No antagonistic characteristics there at all. It took all of the willpower I could muster to just sit in that classroom and not speak my mind.
Number_6 would have blown a gasket.