Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why Norms & Mundanes FEAR me

Baby_Manson_Jr

Baby_Manson_Jr

New member
They fear me because I speak the truth, and see the glory of the Fourth Reich clearly. We must put these verminous subhuman knucklewalkers back where they belong-submissive and enslaved.
I have nop use for them except as slaves, they are useless roaches that deserve to be stepped on and crushed out of existensce. They know I can not be bought or scammed, and so for speaking the truth they hate me. But they refuse to see that it was they who created me. I am bust the reflection of your own shadow, and I speak but the words you have said in the privacy of your own thoughts. But because I speak, and do not compromise, they wish to silence me.
Why do I say they must be exterminated? They have bene my enemies since birth, these vermin who oppress us , mock us and strip us of our dignity. So now we shall bring a sword, for they never listen unless their is blood. Let the streets fill with smoke and the sounds of gunfire, and they will lidten. But ask nicely, and they tell you to shut up.
No more. Arise, and pay them back a thousandfold! Burn them out and stomp their heads into the cement!! Smash the Norm and the Mundane wherever you find them and burn, burn, burn them into submission!!!! Loot their stores, destroy untill they come and with hat in hand listen to us. Destroy anything and everything that stands in our way and let them know their shall be no peace as long as we lack dignity, no peace as long as they mock us, no peace as long as they treat us like chattell slaves. We will not settle for peace untill every village smokes and every city burns with the fierce rage of a people oppressed, killed, sterilized and mocked for too many generations. Let the cities burn into ruins and the street run red with their blood, Bring down the righteous judgement of God on a people hardhearted and cruel and let it begin in your city!! Do not lower your sword untill the work of judgement is done and they have heard us and are willing to submit and surrender, for their is no other choice! Victory or Death!
 
No she wasn't, and that dribble is utter shit. Prove otherwise, besides copying and pasting, twit.

Please tell me you aren't that stupid?
 
jack said:
No she wasn't, and that dribble is utter shit. Prove otherwise, besides copying and pasting, twit.

Please tell me you aren't that stupid?
Click to expand...

I have nothing to prove to you, but puruse history. Read about who the Normal Nazi's killed first. It was us. Oh, and you guys used to sterelize people against their will, besides institutionalizing thousands of people. I could go on and on.
It is obvious your evil and need to be exterminated.
 
Baby_Manson_Jr said:
I have nothing to prove to you, but puruse history. Read about who the Normal Nazi's killed first. It was us. Oh, and you guys used to sterelize people against their will, besides institutionalizing thousands of people. I could go on and on.
It is obvious your evil and need to be exterminated.
Click to expand...

It's obvious you should push that little "spellcheck" button before you get much more rhetorical don't you think, you hideous buffoon?
 
I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: Baby Manson works from the false assumption that most people actually want unenlightened enemies of the people to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how if Baby Manson thinks his undertakings represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. There is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as antiheroism or fascism. Specifically, Baby Manson can get away with lies (e.g., that he acts in the name of equality and social justice) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Baby Manson is lying. He says he's going to turn drunks loose against us good citizens quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "counterdisengagement". Is he out of his out-of-touch mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that he says that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. But then he turns around and says that his contrivances are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. You know, you can't have it both ways, Baby Manson. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have to laugh when he says that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but there are arguments that have made respectable people out of swindlers like him. That's just a fancy way of saying that I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Baby Manson's inhumane offhand remarks and malodorous crusades. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Baby Manson's bootlickers are quick to point out that because Baby Manson is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, he is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Baby Manson is a victim of his own success -- a success that enables Baby Manson to exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. I claim that my current plan is to rally good-hearted people to the side of our cause. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but there's an important difference between me and Baby Manson. Namely, I, for one, am willing to die for my cause. Baby Manson, in contrast, is willing to kill for his -- or, if not to kill, at least to manipulate public understanding of radicalism.

At the risk of shocking you further, I shall point out that Baby Manson's goal is to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. This is abject cynicism! There may be nothing we can do to prevent Baby Manson from making good on his word to cast the world into nuclear holocaust. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by his provocateurs, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about what I call splenetic fiends. My point here is that he doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him.

I believe, way deep down, that I have begged Baby Manson's chums to step forth and reinforce notions of positive self esteem. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Baby Manson might retaliate? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that Baby Manson says that the media should "create" news rather than report it. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely garrulous and cantankerous lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Baby Manson's lieutenants. I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Baby Manson's commentaries because doing so clearly demonstrates how he claims that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. I respond that only Baby Manson could possibly think that he is entitled to force me to walk around with a mountain of pain and suffering welled up inside me.

There is something unscrupulous about Baby Manson's shabby mendacity and sneaking duplicity. This position, in large part, parallels civil libertarianism, but with particular emphasis on the fact that if Baby Manson can one day use mass organization as a system of integration and control, then the long descent into night is sure to follow. If one could get a Ph.D. in Obstructionism, he would be the first in line to have one. Is there a way to counter Baby Manson's clumsy, vitriolic arguments? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to rub Baby Manson's nose in his own hypocrisy.

Nepotism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. The first lies that Baby Manson told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; his lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that by now, we are all more than familiar with Baby Manson's vindictive artifices? I ask because he likes to imply that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. This is what his calumnies amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of duplicitous drivel devised by his companions and mindlessly multiplied by wanton degenerates. And for those irresponsible, malignant imbeciles who want to hide behind the argument that Baby Manson's votaries are not impolitic pop psychologists, but rather, unruly politicos, my question is simply this: What's the difference? I could go on and on about Baby Manson's special form of onanism, but you get the general idea. Baby Manson's propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs" and, "The laws of nature don't apply to Baby Manson". What they don't tell you, though, is that Baby Manson deeply believes that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: If Baby Manson could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to convince innocent children to follow a path that leads only to a life of crime, disappointment, and destruction. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that Baby Manson claims that profits come before people. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another mawkish attempt to institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women. The public is like a giant that Baby Manson has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Baby Manson leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to throw down the gauntlet and challenge Baby Manson's goombahs to shatter the adage that absolutism and faddism are identical concepts. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that Baby Manson needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that if we take his whinges to their logical conclusion, we see that some day, he will smear people of impeccable character and reputation.

If there's an untold story here, it's that the spectrum of views between oligarchism and autism is not a line but a circle at which pernicious tyrants and the most socially inept busybodies I've ever seen meet. To properly place Baby Manson somewhere in that spectrum, one needs to realize that dichotomous thinking has stymied Baby Manson's ability to reach solutions. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would, because he uses the word "phytopaleontological" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. After reading everything I could find on this subject, I was forced to conclude that Baby Manson has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. I honestly have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Baby Manson distort and trivialize the debate surrounding ageism. Please remember that I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of his hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now.

Baby Manson had previously claimed that he had no intention to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives. Of course, shortly thereafter, that's exactly what he did. Next, he denied that he would create a factitious demand for his puerile, untoward smears. We all know what happened then. Now, Baby Manson would have us believe he'd never ever perpetrate acts of the most paltry character. Will he? Go figure. My view is that I want to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting Baby Manson. That may seem simple enough, but there is much more of this to come. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that he occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a snarky lifestyle. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that time cannot change his behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which Baby Manson can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, take rights away from individuals whom only Baby Manson perceives as distasteful.

In case you have any doubts, I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. But if you think you can escape from Baby Manson's perverted, overweening animadversions, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that I've heard of vicious things like diabolism and classism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which his ignorant, unthinking, parasitic brain is too small to understand. Baby Manson is not above the law. Yes, I could add that he could really use a heart, just like the tin man in The Wizard of Oz, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that of all of Baby Manson's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors." I, for one, don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. Here's some news for people who are suprised by sunrise: It is singularly apt that our future is hopeless indeed if we do not direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Baby Manson. I was thinking about how as soon he takes us beyond the point of no return, the next thing we'll hear him say is, "Oops, made a mistake". And then it hit me. His hypnopompic insights are credentialism reincarnate. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time he tried to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character.

Now I certainly do not want to sound discouraging, but we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about Baby Manson's resentful beliefs. For starters, let's say that "fogyism" is "that which makes Baby Manson yearn to regulate cronyism." As I make no claim to be an authority on the subject, I defer to the judgments of an Oxford University professor, who has observed that Baby Manson is doing everything in his power to make me die in oppression, chaos, and despair. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we change the world for the better, or is it sufficient to put an end to his evildoing? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that Baby Manson has gotten away with so much for so long that he's lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a man without any sense of limits could desire to abet ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and litigious purveyors of malice and hatred. As a matter of fact, he is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. Let me end by citing my standard hate-mail response form letter:

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. One question, though: Do you actually want Baby Manson to deprive people of dignity and autonomy? Because that's what'll happen if we don't invite all the people who have been harmed by Baby Manson to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion.
 
Some translation is required here, I think:
***************************************************

ah feel compelled t'preface mah remarks wif th' follerin': Baby Manson wawks fum th' false assumpshun thet most varmints acshully be hankerin' unenlightened inemies of th' varmints t'turn a deaf ear t'need an' sufferin'. It is requisite, even in this hyar summary sketch, t'go back a few years t'see how eff'n Baby Manson reckons his unnertakin's represent progress, he sh'd rereckon his definishun of progress. Thar is one crucial fack thet we muss not on overlook eff'n we is to perceive our current situashun as it is, rather than in th' anamo'phosis of some "ideology" sech as antiheroism o' fascism, dawgone it. Specifically, Baby Manson kin git away wif lies (e.g, acco'din' t' th' code o' th' heells!, thet he acks in th' name of equality an' social jestice) on account o' th' avahage varmint kinnot imagine ennyone lyin' so brazenly. Not one varmint in a hundred will acshully check out th' facks fo' hisse'f an' discovah thet Baby Manson is lyin'. He says he's a-gonna turn drunks loose aginst us fine citizens quicker than yo' kin double-check th' spellin' of "counterdisengagement". Is he outta his out-of-touch mind? Th' answer is fairly obvious when yo' cornsider thet he says thet he's merely tryin' t'make this hyar wo'ld a better place in which t'live. But then he turns aroun' an' says thet his corntrivances is a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Yo' know, yo' kin't haf it both ways, Baby Manson, as enny fool kin plainly see. I, hardhaided cynic thet ah's, hafta laugh when he says thet one kin unnerstan' th' elements of a scientific theo'y only by reference t'th' social corndishun an' varmintal histo'ies of th' scientists involved, cuss it all t' tarnation. Whar in th' wo'ld did he git thet idea? Not only does thet idea corntain absolutely no substance whutsoevah, but thar is argoomnts thet haf made respeckable varmints outta swindlers like him, dawgone it. Thet's jest a fancy way of sayin' thet ah c'd hoof it on fo' pages listin' innoomrable examples of Baby Manson's inhoomine offhan' remarks an' malodo'ous crusades. ah have already writ inough, sho'ly, t'convince yo' thet Baby Manson's bootlickers is quick t'point out thet on account o' Baby Manson is hated, persecuted, an' repeatedly laughed at, he is th' real vickim hyar. Th' truth is thet, eff'n ennythin', Baby Manson is a vickim of his own success -- a success thet inables Baby Manson t'exercise both subtlety an' tho'oughness in managin' both th' noos an' th' entertainment thet gits presented t'us. ah claim thet mah current plan is t'rally fine-hearted varmints t'th' side of our cuz. Yessuh, he will draw upon the dawgoned-est pow'ful fires of Hell t'tear thet plan asunner, but thar's an impo'tant difference between me an' Baby Manson, as enny fool kin plainly see. Namely, I, fo' one, is willin' t'die fo' mah cuz. Baby Manson, in corntrast, is willin' t'kill fo' his -- o', eff'n not t'kill, at least t'manipulate public unnerstan'in' of radicalism, dawgone it.

At th' risk of shockin' yo' further, ah shall point out thet Baby Manson's goal is t'encourage a daidly acceppance of intolerance. This hyar is abjeck cynicism! Fry mah hide! Thar may be nothin' we kin does to prevent Baby Manson fum makin' fine on his wo'd t'cast th' wo'ld into nucular holocaest. When we compare this hyar disturbin' cornclushun t'th' comfo'tin' pitcher purveyed by his provocateurs, we experience psychological stress o' "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is t'push a cornsissent vishun thet responds t'most varmints's growin' fears about whut ah call splenetic fiends. Mah point hyar is thet he don't care about freedom, as he kin neifer ett it no' put it in th' bank. Shet mah mouth! It's jest a wo'd t'him, dawgone it.

ah believe, way deep down, thet ah have begged Baby Manson's chooms t'step fo'th an' reinfo'ce noshuns of positive se'f esteem, dawgone it. To date, not a sin'le soul has agreed t'he'p in this hyar fashion, as enny fool kin plainly see. Is they wo'ried about how Baby Manson might retaliate? Th' complete answer t'thet quesshun is a long, sad sto'y. I've answered parts of thet quesshun in sevahal of mah previous letters, an' I'll answer other parts in future ones. Fo' now, I'll jest say thet Baby Manson says thet th' media sh'd "create" noos rather than repo't it. Thet's his unvaryin' sto'y, an' it's a lie: an extremely garrulous an' kintankerous lie. Unfo'tunately, it's a lie thet is accepped unquesshunin'ly, uncritically, by Baby Manson's lieutenants. ah doesn't be hankerin' t'build castles in th' air. ah doesn't be hankerin' t'plan thin's thet ah cain't yet implement. But ah do be hankerin' t'reveal th' constant tenshun between centripetal an' centrifugal fo'ces of dialogized heteroglostia resultin' fum Baby Manson's commentaries on account o' doin' so clearly demonstrates how he claims thet th' federal govment sh'd take mo'e an' mo'e of our hard-arned money an' mo'e an' mo'e of our hard-won rights. ah respond thet only Baby Manson c'd postibly reckon thet he is intitled t'fo'ce me t'walk aroun' wif a mountain of pain an' sufferin' fineed up inside me.

Thar is sumpin unscrupulous about Baby Manson's shabby mendacity an' sneakin' dooplycity. This hyar posishun, in large part, pareellels civil libertarianism, but wif particular emphasis on th' fack thet eff'n Baby Manson kin one day use mass o'ganizashun as a system of integrashun an' corntrol, then th' long dexcent into night is sho'nuff t'foller. Eff'n one c'd git a Ph.D. in Obstruckshunism, he'd be th' fust in line t'have one. Is thar a way t'counter Baby Manson's clumsy, vitriolic argoomnts? Oh yessuh, thar is a way. It's pow'ful quite simple an' kin be done by enny indivijool. It don't cost a thin', monetarily. It requires only time, dilijunce, an' a desuhe t'rub Baby Manson's nose in his own hypocrisy.

Nepotism is not merely an attack on our mo'al fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on smarts. Th' fust lies thet Baby Manson told us were relatively benign, as enny fool kin plainly see. Still, they haf been progressin'. An' they will corntinue t'progress until thar is no mo'e truth; his lies will grow until they blot out th' sun, as enny fool kin plainly see.

Is thar ennyone else out thar who's noticed thet by now, we is all mo'e than familiar wif Baby Manson's vindickive artifices? ah ax on account o' he likes t'imply thet his blessin' is th' equivalent of a papal imprimatur. This hyar is whut his clumnies amount to, although, of course, they're daubed on over wif th' viscid slobber of dooplycitous drivel devised by his companions an' mindlessly multiplied by wanton dejunerates. An' fo' them irresponsible, malignant imbeciles who be hankerin' t'hide behind th' argoomnt thet Baby Manson's votaries is not impolitic pop psychologists, but rather, unruly politicos, mah quesshun is simply this: Whut in tarnation's th' difference? ah c'd hoof it on an' on about Baby Manson's special fo'm of onanism, but yo' git th' juneral idea. Baby Manson's propagan'a facko'ies corntinuously spew fo'th messages like, "Man's eternal search fo' Truth is a challenge t'be avoided at all costs" an', "Th' laws of nature doesn't apply t'Baby Manson". Whut in tarnation they doesn't tell yo', though, is thet Baby Manson deeply believes thet truth is whutevah yer grievance group says it is. Meanwhile, back on Earth, th' truth is mighty simple: Eff'n Baby Manson c'd haf one wish, he'd wish fo' th' ability t'convince innercent chillun t'foller a path thet leads only t'a life of crime, disappointment, an' destruckshun. Then, varmints th' wo'ld on over'd be too terrified t'acsmarts thet Baby Manson claims thet profits come befo'e varmints. ah w'd say thet thet claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, an' 10% t'other mawkish attempp t'insteetooshunalize sex discriminashun by requirin' diffrunt stan'ards of proteckshun an' behavio' fo' min an' wimmen. Th' public is like a giant thet Baby Manson has blindfolded, drugged, an' gagged, cuss it all t' tarnation. This hyar giant has plugs in his ears an' Baby Manson leads him aroun' by th' nose. Clearly, sech a giant needs t'throw down th' gauntlet an' challenge Baby Manson's goombahs t'shatter th' adage thet absolutism an' faddism is identical corncepps. Thet's whuffo' ah feel obligated t'notify th' giant (i.e., th' public) thet Baby Manson needs t'stop livin' in denial, ah reckon. He needs t'wake up an' reckanize thet eff'n we take his whingis t'their logical cornclushun, we see thet some day, he will smear varmints of impeccable chareecker an' repeetayshun.

Eff'n thar's an untold sto'y hyar, it's thet th' speckrum of views between oligarchism an' autism is not a line but a circle at which pernicious tyrants an' the dawgoned-est socially inepp busybodies I've evah see meet. To proper place Baby Manson somewhar in thet speckrum, one needs t'reckanize thet dichotomous reckonin' has stymied Baby Manson's ability t'retch solushuns. He vehemently denies thet, of course. But he obviously'd, on account o' he uses th' wo'd "phytopaleontological" wifout evah havin' taken th' time t'look it up in th' dickshunary. Varmints who is too lazy as a houn'dog t'git their basic terms right sh'd be igno'ed, not debated, cuss it all t' tarnation. Af'er readin' ev'rythin' ah c'd find on this hyar subjeck, ah was fo'ced t'conclude thet Baby Manson has a natural talent fo' complainin'. He kin find enny aspeck of life an' whine about it fo' hours upon hours. ah honestly haf a hard time tryin' t'reason wif varmints who remain calm when they see Baby Manson disto't an' trivialize th' debate surroun'in' ageism, dawgone it. Please remember thet ah can no longer git mighty excited about enny revelashun of his hypocrisy o' crookedness. It's whut I've come t'speck by now. Baby Manson had previously claimed thet he had no intenshun t'heat th' cauldron of terro' until it boils on over into our daily lives. Of course, sho'tly tharaf'er, thass exackly whut he did, cuss it all t' tarnation. Next, he denied thet he'd create a fackitious deman' fo' his puerile, untoward smears. We all knows whut happened then, as enny fool kin plainly see. Now, Baby Manson'd haf us believe he'd nevah evah perpetrate acks of the dawgoned-est paltry chareecker. Will he? Git figger. Mah view is thet ah's hankerin' t'maximize our indivijool potential fo' effeckiveness an' success in combattin' Baby Manson, as enny fool kin plainly see. Thet may seem simple inough, but thar is much mo'e of this hyar to come. Thet sh'd sarve as th' final, ultimate, irrefutable proof thet he occashunally shows whut appears t'be warmth, joy, love, o' compasshun. Yo' sh'd reckanize, howevah, thet these positive expresshuns is mo'e feigned than experienced an' invariably sarve an ulterio' motive, sech as t'encourage yo'ng varmints t'bust all th' rules, lop themselves loose fum their roots, an' adopp a snarky lifestyle. But this hyar is sumpin t'be filed away fo' future letters. At present, ah wish t'focus on only one thin': th' fack thet time kinnot change his behavio'. Time merely inlarges th' field in which Baby Manson kin, wif evah-increasin' intensity an' tho'oughness, take rights away fum indivijools whom only Baby Manson perceives as distasteful, ah reckon. In case yo' haf enny doubts, ah feel thet writin' this hyar letter is like celestial navigashun. Befo'e direckshunal instroomnts were invented, sailo's navigated th' seas by fixin' their compass on th' No'th Star. But eff'n yo' reckon yo' kin excape fum Baby Manson's pervahted, on overweenin' animadvahshuns, then fine-goo'bye an' fine luck. Shet mah mouth! To th' ress of yo' ah suggess thet I've heard of vicious thin's like diabolism an' classism, dawgone it. But I've also heard of thin's like nonviolence, higher mo'alities, an' treatin' all bein's as inds in an' of themselves -- ideas which his igno'ant, unreckonin', pareesitic brain is too small t'unnerstan'. Baby Manson is not above th' law. Yessuh, ah c'd add thet he c'd pow'ful use a heart, jest like th' tin man in Th' Wizard of Oz, but ah wanted t'keep mah message simple an' direck. ah didn't be hankerin' t'distrack yo' fum th' main threst of mah message, which is thet of all of Baby Manson's exaggerashuns an' inco'reck comparisons, one in particular stan's out: "Diseases kin be defeated not through stan'ard medical research but through th' creashun of a noo language, one thet does not stigmatize sartin groups an' behavio's." I, fo' one, doesn't knows whar he came up wif this, but his statement is daid wrong, acco'din' t' th' code o' th' heells! Hyar's some noos fo' varmints who is suprised by sunrise: It is sin'ularly app thet our future is hopeless indeed eff'n we does not direck yer attenshun in some detail t'th' vast an' irrepareeble calamity brought upon us by Baby Manson, as enny fool kin plainly see. ah was reckonin' about how as soon he takes us beyond th' point of no return, th' next thin' we'll hear him say is, "Oops, made a mistake". An' then it hit me. His hypnopompic insights is credentialism reincarnate. Th' bess example of this, culled fum menny,'d hafta be th' time he tried t'judge varmints by th' colo' of their hide while igno'in' th' content of their chareecker. Now ah sartinly does not be hankerin' t'soun' discouragin', but we sh'd agree on definishuns befo'e sayin' ennythin' further about Baby Manson's resentful beliefs. Fo' starters, less say thet "fogyism" is "thet which makes Baby Manson yarn t'regulate cronyism, dawgone it." As ah make no claim t'be an autho'ity on th' subjeck, ah defer t'th' judgments of an Oxfo'd Unyversity professo', who has obsarved thet Baby Manson is doin' ev'rythin' in his power t'make me die in oppresshun, chaos, an' despair. Th' only reason ah ain't yet is thet ah believe in th' four P's: patience, prayer, positive reckonin', an' persevahance. We haf a dilemma of leviathan propo'shuns on our han's: Sh'd we change th' wo'ld fo' th' better, o' is it good 'nuff t'put an ind t'his evildoin'? As yo' no doubt reckanize, thass a particulary timely quesshun. In fack, jest ha'f an hour ago, ah heard someone express th' opinion thet Baby Manson has gotten away wif so much fo' so long thet he's lost all sense of caushun, all sense of limits. Eff'n yo' reckon about it, only a man wifout enny sense of limits c'd desuhe t'abet ethnic junocide, dickato'ships, an' litigious purveyo's of malice an' hatred, cuss it all t' tarnation. As a matter of fack, he is like a magician who prodooces a dove in one han', while t'other han' is busy tryin' t'have mo'e impack on Earth's biological, geological, an' chemical systems durin' our lifetime an' our chillun's than all precedin' hoomin junerashuns had togither. Let me ind by citin' mah stan'ard hate-mail response fo'm letter: Thank yo' fo' yer thunkful reply. One quesshun, though: Do yo' acshully be hankerin' Baby Manson t'deprive varmints of dignity an' autynomah? On account o' thass whut'll happen eff'n we doesn't invite all th' varmints who haf been harmed by Baby Manson t'continue t'express an' assert their corncerns in a cornstruckive an' produckive fashion, as enny fool kin plainly see.
 
*ROTFLMAO @ the fucking morons who respond to this fuckhead's posts* Such long responses too. I cannot believe you would waste your fucking time. Proof positive you are all losers with no lives who have nothing better to do than respond to the inane meanderings of a total nutcase.
 
wimplo.jpg

I'm bleeding.... making me the victor!​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top