Then there's Tulsi Gabbard....what the holy fucking FUCK is that bullshit all about?
She's the least crazy dog in the pack. Not to say that she's exactly a paragon of sanity, she's just the LEAST moonbat barking-monkey looney tunes of the Democrats.
Then there's Tulsi Gabbard....what the holy fucking FUCK is that bullshit all about?

Are you confident enough to change your WF avatar to "Ramen is God" again if you get it wrong? (Again.) :marathon:
Yes, there is, and it has been disclosed since: Illegal aliens and dead fuckers. The Establishment's time is over, fucker. Suck it up and deal with it. The American voter has fucking had it with the corruptocracy. Tough shit for your idols, huh?
I see Ancalagon has once again fucked off back to his little 'safe space'. Fucking typical. Can't hack it in a space you can't simply ban opposing voices from, can ya, ya fuckin' sissy?
You haven’t posted anything worth rebutting.
No. There is no evidence that any widespread voter irregularities contributed to Hillary’s overwhelming popular vote win.

Ive never felt this was the correct way to go about it. The smart thing to do here would be to just hold the articles and wait for the next election to see what the will of the people really is.
Renato Mariotti writing for Politico said:Withholding articles of impeachment smacks of political gamesmanship and risks losing the moral high ground.
Only pointing out that just b/c the system favors Republicans, doesn't mean the majority of the country does.
How will you protect your fragile brain if Trump wins the popular vote too in 2020? Russians? Ukrainian influence? Chemtrails? :marathon:
It actually does mean that, since what the majority of the country wants is what steers the system. For a Democrat, you don't seem to understand just how a representative Democracy works. Just because you ignore the actual majority when you're not trash talking them doesn't mean they vanish and make you the majority.