Boredom

[Lilith]

You know, I just figured out. If your man wants a threesome and you're not too keen on having another woman or man in the bedroom with you, the doll could sub and there'd be no problems!

 

[MessengerX]

And seeing as how you pulled this from www.dictionary.com:

1.
1. Of or relating to a sizable group of people sharing a common and distinctive racial, national, religious, linguistic, or cultural heritage.
2. Being a member of a particular ethnic group, especially belonging to a national group by heritage or culture but residing outside its national boundaries: ethnic Hungarians living in northern Serbia.
3. Of, relating to, or distinctive of members of such a group: ethnic restaurants; ethnic art.
2. Relating to a people not Christian or Jewish; heathen.

I'd like to present you with this:

1. A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.
2. A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution: the German race.
3. A genealogical line; a lineage.
4. Humans considered as a group.
5. Biology.
1. An interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits. A race that has been given formal taxonomic recognition is known as a subspecies.
2. A breed or strain, as of domestic animals.
6. A distinguishing or characteristic quality, such as the flavor of a wine.

You are therefore of the same race as an African. Are you sure you want to use dictionary.com as a source?

 

[Lilith]

Ok MX, I'm assuming that you have pwned Luci multiple times by now. Is really necessary to drive him into the ground?

Wait, nevermind, proceed!

 

[SaintLucifer]

There is no such thing as an Anglo-Saxon race. You said so yourself that:

"My family claims I have 'Norman' blood in me which I absolutely refuse to accept. NO way do I have froggy blood in me."

Yet by the logic I have seen, a person of English nationality could have 'Norman' blood in him and still be considered Anglo-Saxon. But of course, he would be of the same 'race' as you. :roll:

I don't think you know much about the way people are classified.

CECIL RHODES (of Rhodes scholar fame)

I contend that we are the finest race in the world, and that the more
of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend
that every acre added to our territory means the birth of more of the
English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence.

Added to this, the absorption of the greater portion of the world under
our rule simply means the end of all wars. The objects one should
work for are first the furtherance of the British Empire, the bringing of
the whole uncivilized world under British rule, the recovery of the
United States, the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.

About Cecil Rhodes:
Throughout his life he proclaimed his faith in the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race: a faith that was to lead to his being likened to Adolf Hitler. Nor did he make any secret of his own role in furthering British interests.

U.S. Congress

"Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the 'Nordic' race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. Let us concede, in all fairness that the Czech is a more sturdy laborer, with a very low percentage of crime and insanity, that the Jew is the best businessman in the world, and that the Italian has a spiritual grasp and an artistic sense which have greatly enriched the world and which have, indeed, enriched us, a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative sense which the Nordic rarely attains. Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It well behooves them to be humble. What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves." (Cong. Rec. April 8, 1924; p. 5922).

While ethnicity and race are related concepts (Abizadeh 2001), the concept of ethnicity is rooted in the idea of social groups, marked especially by shared nationality, tribal affiliation, religious faith, shared language, or cultural and traditional origins and backgrounds, whereas race is rooted in the idea of a biological classification of Homo sapiens according to chosen genotypic and/or phenotypic traits.

RULE BRITANNIA!!!

BOOM!!

 

[MessengerX]

Cecil Rhodes wasn't an anthropologist.

While ethnicity and race are related concepts (Abizadeh 2001), the concept of ethnicity is rooted in the idea of social groups, marked especially by shared nationality, tribal affiliation, religious faith, shared language, or cultural and traditional origins and backgrounds, whereas race is rooted in the idea of a biological classification of Homo sapiens according to chosen genotypic and/or phenotypic traits.

This modern-day perception also emphasizes that race does not exist as white or black but only what humans of varying races, ethnicities, nationalities, etc have in common. It is also quick to point out and inflate that differences in genes occur most frequently in the same of the aforementioned groupings.

Wikipedia is a very leftist source, dude. Ethnicity is the best word to describe what you are talking about.

 

[SaintLucifer]

Cecil Rhodes wasn't an anthropologist.



This modern-day perception also emphasizes that race does not exist as white or black but only what humans of varying races, ethnicities, nationalities, etc have in common. It is also quick to point out and inflate that differences in genes occur most frequently in the same of the aforementioned groupings.

Wikipedia is a very leftist source, dude. Ethnicity is the best word to describe what you are talking about.

Nothing I posted came from Wikipedia. It came from American and British racial studies. Every single site proclaims 'Anglo-Saxon' to be a race.

 

[MessengerX]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnicity

It's word for word. My mistake, then.

Race is a concept which is purely biological. However, you must understand that 'Anglo-Saxon' is an umbrella term which incorporates different phenotypes in its make-up. The two terms are in conflict IMO.