Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

(GAYS, YOUR THOUGHTS) Science told: hands off gay sheep

MessengerX said:
In debate or rhetoric, the slippery slope is an argument for the likelihood of one event or trend given another.

An example:

"If we genetically engineer out the homosexual gene, the Christian Right will put a seals of approval on your birth certificate."

The argument takes on one of various semantical forms:
  • In one form, the proposer suggests that by making a move in a particular direction, we start down a "slippery slope". Having started down the metaphorical slope, it appears likely that we will continue in the same direction (the arguer usually sees the direction as a negative direction; hence the "sliding downwards" metaphor).
  • Another form appears more static, arguing that admitting or permitting A leads to admitting or permitting B, by following a long chain of logical relationships.
Not to mention the others you've committed. I don't think you are very familiar with debate.

LOL!!!!!!

You are trying so damn hard. So damn hard. I would help you out to understand the basics, but this is too much fun.

So close, yet so far. This is the morons at SD.net suffer from.
 
MessengerX said:
An argument is a statement (premise) or group of statements (premises) offered in support of another statement (conclusion).

Maybe Impy could learn a bit from Google, eh?

Yeah, I can see that you are Googling. Struggling to understand.

At least you admit you are an ignorant fucktard: "I had to Google."

And you still can't get it right.

Impress me. Find the correct terminology.
 
It goes back to the one about being more intelligent than you. Why would I waste time typing up common sense knowledge when I can simply copy and paste it, and watch you scramble around trying to counter it to save face?
 
MessengerX said:
It does back to the one about being more intelligent than you. Why would I waste time typing up common sense knowledge when I can simply copy and paste it, and watch you scramble around trying to counter it to save face?

Counter what? You are attempting to completely stand on someone else and you are still absolutely incorrect.

Maybe you think you are "winning" because more people agree with you? Are you fucking serious?

Go, dance. Impress me and understand why my statement is not an argument and thus why no fallacy can be present.
 
Boy are you easy to wind up. You so remind me of me, but without the saving graces.

It's been fun. Good night. Try not to let the throbbing vein keep you awake.
 
MessengerX said:
It goes back to the one about being more intelligent than you. Why would I waste time typing up common sense knowledge when I can simply copy and paste it, and watch you scramble around trying to counter it to save face?

I told you he wouldn't get it.
 
I don't see what the queers are all in a wrist-flapping, flannel-curling uproar over. Gay "parents" could receive artificial insemination or surrogate child-bearing and then choose to raise a little queerspawn with the proposed technique just as easily as straight parents could use it to de-fag their own future brats.
 
Top