What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I guess WF still misses me.

I still, to this day, find it absurd and hilarious that WF's Stasi claim, "Well, we would have let him back in, buuuuut...!"

No, they wouldn't have. They just wanted to get in a free lick, and they wanted it to stay that way. They just didn't like getting hit back, which was the real reason they banned me both times. They wanted a punching bag, not a boxing match. Pussies.
 
Probably the real reason you got your temp ban. They love a one-sided fight, but when you fight back, down comes the ban hammer under any excuse -- or, as in the case of my second ban, no excuse whatsoever.
 
And, now Dinner (Oerdin here) is talkin' shit about me over there again.

Protip, kid: You're not one of the "in crowd" over there anymore. Sucking up to them by keeping up the anti-Castle tropes won't win you back into their good graces. Why you'd want to be in their good graces is unfathomable, anyway.
 
Well, looks like I'm banned again... this time for good... for posting a pic of Barry and Michelle Obama modified to look like monkeys. They might have objected to the use of the word "nigger" too. Dunno.

Just as well. WF was cutting into my EVE Online time.
 
Yeah, you can't say "nigger" over there anymore. They made up that rule and retroactively banned me for breaking it when I was mocking them for banning GTurner because he was "a disruptive influence" because he said true things that they didn't like and couldn't refute. So I showed them what a "disruptive influence" really looked like.
 
Meanwhile, they have this lovely little nugget:

Quest said:
Calling a racist a racist isn't even an insult. It's an accurate observation. This is the same old John Castle "tolerate my intolerance! :weep: " crap.
Click to expand...

If there was an award given for failure to get a point, Quest would have the contest in the bag right there.

The point I would try to make to them all the time was not that they should defend bigotry from bigotry; it was simply that they are defending bigotry from bigotry. That's exactly what they're doing.

The same people who moan and gnash their teeth over Christian bakers refusing to create wedding cakes for gay couples are the ones who throw tantrums when Oerdin/Dinner uses racial slurs to refer to religionists who murder gay people.

The same people who were all afroth at the mouth over Trump talking about grabbing women "by the pussy" and how awful and misogynist that is? They're defending people who murder women for refusing sexual advances, or for being too "Westernized", or for being the victims of rape.

So yeah, the very people who are soiling their metaphorical panties over Dinner/Oerdin calling Muslims "animals" are defending the violent, bigoted actions of Muslims.

And they don't even see the ten ton brick of irony, or if they do, they don't give a shit.
 
Or, to put it more succinctly:

HSvxfQg.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top