Messenger said:
Gagh has gotten away with spamming more than once, and I don't care about making a fuss of it because that gag has gotten really lame by now.
If anything, Caitriona is to blame for passively condoning any possible wrongdoing on his part by not 'punishing' him or 'spanking him' or 'changing his diaper' when she stated that from on she would, because we all know her to be fair and impartial and a stickler for the rules.
And she says WE empowered him. :roll:
Largely what you post is true. I don't agree with the Cait issue, but who am I to deny my own actions? I know fully well what I am doing when I trot off to do it.
If she says you lot empowered me, I am prone to agree to some extent. I never had an issue with anyone before October. I came back off a three week break and found your small bunch of troops after me all over the board.
You were bound to get a response in some manner weren't you? You know what I'm all about on this board, and that's all you got back.
You pushed it so far, it has now begun to effect the way our admins (our GOOD admins, btw) interract with each other. I could have ended it at any time, but it had to be on YOUR grounds - not mine. I don't end what I haven't started.
Thankfully, for everyone, I see the DLA v Gagh, and whatever vestiges of the DLA remain as a dead issue now. I believe you are a neutral now, MX. If you mess with me, you'll get the same back as I give to anyone else, and I doubt you'd expect anything more.
As for my boardwide behaviour. I don't care. I never have - I won't change for ANYONE here. If I am shitcanned, with it goes over three years of membership & tens of thousands of posts. I can afford to drop my time here and spend it at a board I hold closer to me that this place ever will.
Burning bridges? I never saw a bridge to begin with.