Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jennifer Lawrence

I looked at some of the pics without giving it much consideration. Whoever leaked them is a scumbag, but it's very difficult not to have a peek when you know they're only a click away.
 
That's pretty much how I feel. It's horrible that it's happened but me taking a moral stand and not looking isn't going to make a difference...
 
I looked at the pictures as it was the least I can do, but I have taken the moral stance that I won't wank over them.
 
That's very noble. It seems this scumbag's going to do a wikileaks style reveal of them in dribs and drabs.
 
I haven't looked, mainly so I can appear smug on the internet.

There is also the added benefit of sneering at other internet users and making them feel dirty.

DIRTY BOYS
 
I actually only saw one of the pictures, and didn't know they were stolen from her at the time. SO I AM STILL HIGH AND MIGHTY.
 
I dont really know who most of the other women were, but Kate Upton looked like she had nice boobies, so gave hers a look.

I mean, if they are already there is seems rude not to.
 
Lack of privacy resulting in melons on the internet. Who would have thunk it?
 
As far as I can tell, Kate Upton is only famous for having big breasts. I don't know if she had previously done nudity (not that that would make hacking her private pics okay.)
 
CaptainWacky said:
As far as I can tell, Kate Upton is only famous for having big breasts. I don't know if she had previously done nudity (not that that would make hacking her private pics okay.)
Click to expand...

Why would anybody even want to see that shit? Low-rez, shit-quality photos of titties. Big fuckin' whoop, when there's high-rez top quality photos of big titties all OVER the interwebz. Some people are just fuckin' stupid.
 
As some newspaper pointed out, Marlyn Monro had naked pictures come out at the height of her fame, never did her any harm, and ScaJo, if anything it makes them more relatable, because they are just like the rest of us, albiet it much fitter.
 
Neither does torrenting software and music and tv shows, but we've all done that.

We live in a world of wrongness. so let he who is right cast the first stone.
 
So if someone were to invade your home and steal your things and release your personal information to anyone who wanted it, you wouldn't be mad at them because you once stole a packet of crisps? Because, according to you, they're basically the same thing.
 
The Tomtrek said:
So if someone were to invade your home and steal your things and release your personal information to anyone who wanted it, you wouldn't be mad at them because you once stole a packet of crisps? Because, according to you, they're basically the same thing.
Click to expand...

Well, while you are taking the moral highground, perhaps you want to bump the Bryan Singer thread now that he is innocent again.
 
Actually, not the best example: Singer was never 'guilty' or 'innocent' because the original dropped lawsuits were civil, not criminal.

But now the New York Police Dept is investigating a new criminal complaint against Singer for an incident in 2013. He hasn't been charged yet, but he may be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top