One is totally unrelated to the other.
Faith is a unique problem within the human psyche, with its own need to understand itself presenting even more problems.
How can we fathom a universe which we are a part of as being boundless in itself? It's as difficult to understand as it is to define self-awareness, itself undefinable, with the Ouroboros serving as an excellent illustration as to this problem.
So what does this have to do with faith?
Faith is instinctual. It's almost a need for paternal order in a chaotic universe.
But why assume that a grand intelligence be automatically linked by creation and destiny to us? Because it satisfies a need to understand. Animals aren't capable of imagining planets in space, but we are. So we need a buffer.
The entire notion, IMO, is to mask a truth which would simply drive us insane.
The belief that there is a divine intelligence, to ignore a mindless distribution of stars and galaxies, to ignore the lifeless space beyond our own tiny habitat is extraordinarily anthrocentric. A self-aware God must exist, and it must care for our own continued existence and self-awareness.
It has to be personal. Nothing else could satisfy humans, who in their spare time wonder where the first person came from. It has to be a personal belief. In Judeo-Christian religions, it's God, Jesus, or angels. In Japan, they have their ancestors watching over them. In South America, they have their little ghosts.
What about a soul? Is that needed for a living organism to survive? Hardly. Is it needed for self-awareness? What is self-awareness? Can you describe it without using circular logic?
Have you ever asked yourself if you
are self-aware? If you're simply nothing more than a 'point of view,' watching the film of a human being's life from the best possible vantage point, as it acts and reacts to various stimuli?
Even your thoughts aren't your own. Anything can cause your neurons to fire, and with quantum mechanics describing a random universe of random electrons, which can cause your neurons to begin firing, leading to a chain reaction which can remind you of this or that and thus influence your actions in ways you cannot control.
I tend to shift from time to time, leaning more towards theism or atheism each time. Right now I'm thinking that oblivion = nirvana, and that it awaits us all. It heaven, there would be no hunger.
More accurately, there would be no need for food.
Stripping away one need after another, we come to the need of
self, which also has to be stripped away in order to for our 'self' to fully come to rest in its final destination.
It sounds strange, since all of
life is meant to be ultimately satisfying towards theists somehow, right? The concept of 'self' is the only remaining equalizer in most all beliefs and faiths, save for the really demented ones, like mine.
So what would this heaven of oblivion look like? Although the 'self' would no longer exist, from one perspective it would no longer have any bounderies, and wouldn't distinguish itself from other obliterated 'souls.' They would all be 'one.' And in the event of the total destruction of the observable universe, everything would be nothing, and achieve oneness therein, with no desires or thirsts going unsatisfied or unquenched, and no desire to protect and make immortal that which can't be.