So the illegals took to the streets en masse today. Hundreds of thousands of them in cities coast to coast. Their stated aim was to create a "Day Without Immigrants" and not show up for work in an effort to flaunt their economic clout. To some extent, it worked. Many businesses report large economic losses due to not having their workers available. So this is how the illegals want to protest? By biting the hand that (illegally) feeds them? That's gratitude for ya!
To say the least, this is a divisive issue. Proposals range from the "round 'em up and ship 'em back" crowd to those who want to grant them amnesty with various routes to citizenship. Some supporters proclaim that this country was built by immigrants and our current economy can't survive without them. Others add that we are all immigrants, except for native Americans. To answer that argument, sure, it wasn't right for the Americans to bleed the land of its resources and the native people of their rights for their benefit, but the current wave of illegals are doing the same thing. The illegal's supporters consistently and conveniently forget one key word: ILLEGAL. This may be a news flash to some illegals, but there actually are people here who enter(ed) this country legally. That's why I provided the definition at the top of this article, for the benefit of those immigrants who apparently don't understand that particular word of the English language. Since the US is required to provide assorted legal documents in other languages for the illegals, I'll do the same and translate to Spanish: ilegal-adjetivo 1 Que no está permitido por la ley: consumo ilegal de drogas; comercio ilegal de animales; se le acusa de un delito de detención ilegal. 2 [persona] Que está en una situación que va en contra de la ley: inmigrante ilegal; trabajador ilegal; el número de ilegales se incrementó notablemente durante el último año. Now do you get it?
I agree with the concept that if employment wasn't offered to the illegals by American companies, the problem wouldn't be as big as it is. But guess what? There are laws against hiring illegals. Problem is, the laws aren't enforced. Big business circumvents the law again. It's also a crime to cross the border illegally, but the US is too busy elsewhere to provide the security of its own borders.
On another website's letters page, I saw what may be a brilliant, simple, elegant solution. Round up the illegals and ship 'em home. Then make every able-bodied welfare recipient in this country fill the jobs that the illegals vacate. The taxes paid from the jobs would pay for the deportations. Sure, we'd have to provide health and day care benefits to the new workers, but we're providing those for the illegals now.
These rallies are not supporting immigrants, as the CNN sub-head suggests. These rallies support ILLEGAL immigrants. There is a difference. These are people who, regardless of motive, are law-breakers in this country, flaunting laws little different from those in their own country.
I don't have a problem with anyone wishing to live in the US as long as they obey the laws, just as we who were born here have to do. And those laws include a specific process to follow to become a US citizen.
But granting amnesty to illegals is a slap in the face of all those immigrants who have come here legally and went through the long and costly process to become citizens, and who DO obey the laws of the land.
CoyoteUgly said:So, the bottom line is: the fuckers walked through a desert, hid in the back of a panel truck, or otherwise went through horrendous conditions in order to come to the US and find a job...and then they walk off that job for one day so as to show they can be good citizens.
If I hired 25 Mexicans to work for me, and they didn't show up for work, they'd be out of a job.
TJHairball said:TQ, if she came here illegally in 1986 and has a 7 and 11 year old kid, she's probably a citizen by now, mmk?
In that article... I'd like to point out one thing:Advocating forced labor, i.e., slavery. Ain't it great?
Funny thing. I was watching CNN (this happens several times a year) and they had an INS guy on to talk about why they didn't go rounding people up. Aside from the legal problems of identifying who is or is not an illegal immigrant (remember, not just illegals participated in demonstrations), they also don't have the resources, manpower, or cells to try and put that many people away at once. He mentioned "20,000 beds" as a figure.
Your call on whether he was being honest or not.
Or has sympathy with those who are. I'm under the impression much of the Hispanic community supported this, and - as usual - immigrants' rights advocates, who are often not immigrants themselves.The Question said:If only by exploiting the "anchor baby" loophole. But clearly she still thinks of herself as illegal, or she wouldn't have gone to the "gran marcha".
See the word "make." This implies forcing.Forced labor? Where? What I see him advocating is giving people a choice: support yourselves, now that the jobs are available, or sleep on the street. No more dole for you.
Good thing I don't really believe in Godwin's law.It's funny, ya know. Not to invoke Godwin's law, but if the Third Reich could round up 11 million people with just Hollerith punch-card machines, why can't we round up 11 million people with the technology we have?
TJHairball said:Or has sympathy with those who are. I'm under the impression much of the Hispanic community supported this, and - as usual - immigrants' rights advocates, who are often not immigrants themselves.
See the word "make." This implies forcing.
I'm quite sure it's possible, but I'm under the impression Congress isn't interested in committing political suicide by providing the funds for that sort of program.
That, my dear TQ, depends on the circumstances... most particularly the circumstances of the law itself being a good law, or a bad law.The Question said:And I guess you think breaking the law is okay, too, yes?
Advocates, yes.Implies, possibly; outright advocates, no.
Those gosh darn Congresspeople.Right, can't have Congress actually adhering to the oaths they took by defending this country and its people, can we?
TJHairball said:That, my dear TQ, depends on the circumstances... most particularly the circumstances of the law itself being a good law, or a bad law.
Granted, he probably wasn't thinking things through, but making people do things isn't very nice.
Those gosh darn Congresspeople.
Making?The Question said:Well, since those people are making other people (the taxpayers) support them, I really can't scrounge up any givashit for them, either.
The Question said:^^Forbidden to do their jobs, that's where. Actually forbidden. Isn't that great? Homeland Security is okayed to spy on American citizens, but when it comes to actually fucking defending the homeland, they can't and won't do jack fucking shit.
jack said:What the hell do I have to do with any of this?
Anyway I found the whole thing hilarious, in that funny and sad way. Exposing hypocrisy is never pretty, we all know this.
The racist neocon regime requires cheap labor (and cheap gas) to stay in power.
You don't think pretty white Monterey girls are going to do that kind of work for that kind of money do you?????
Anyway most of the "immigrants" around here are legals on work visas. They all showed, no solidarity there. I spoke to several of them about it, and most were clueless to what the fuck I was talking about.
Imagine "satisfied" immigrants! WOW THE FUCKING MIND BOGGLES! They are willing to get paid 8 bucks an hour to do nothing and you know why? Because 8 bucks an hour here is about 40 in whatever shithole thev're been living in.
You know what illegals mostly do with their money they earn up here? They send it their fucking semistarving families in mexico, well most of it anyway.
When I was out in Santa Fe last year for a week, one thing I noticed is all the Indians(pc Native Americans) were working at jobs in the city and all the mexicans were waiting for the day truck, sometimes all day long. what the fuck is up with that? Racism within racism.
It's kind of like being an Ethiopian Jew in Tel Aviv. You want to see inspirational racism talke a peek at that dysfunction.
Dark Link said:Fucking immigrants. Cops should have pulled up school busses, pilled them all in at gunpoint then shipped their asses back south of the border. The ones who fight back get shot and catapulted back across the border or airlifted and dropped into Mexico City.
Fuckers think they run the country. Lets see them run faster then a bullet.
jack said:Again, this isn't an illegals issue, it's a greed issue.
It's one of the things wrong with our society, and it got pushed in all our fucking faces this past week.
OH, man, those Mexicans were everywhere I went in Sacramento! There were so many of them that the light rail system got backed up by an hour, and everyone was packed like sardines.Laker_Girl said:So how was your day without an immigrant?
Lou The Beagle said:OH, man, those Mexicans were everywhere I went in Sacramento! There were so many of them that the light rail system got backed up by an hour, and everyone was packed like sardines.
If it were a day without an immigrant, why the fuck did I keep tripping over them?
:gagh: