Alex Buchet
New member
Sarek needs Messenger to defend him! ROFL
Alex Buchet said:It got the intended response out of you, which was pathetically narcissistic and persnickety.
I thought that was what being "pwned" meant.Sarek said:Well, why don't we just make it easy and say every time I respond to one of your posts, I've been pwned.
Elrod said:I thought that was what being "pwned" meant.
Really? I must be the first one here to do that.Sarek said:That's your problem. You had a thought.
Elrod said:Really? I must be the first one here to do that.
Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.Sarek said:Nope. There's a few equally as dumb retards floating around TK that have tried to argue the whole, "you replied, you got pwned" thing.
We just politely explain to them the errors of their ways and send them back to whatever grade school type site they originated from. Generally with instructions to graduate before they come back to TK.
A subforum can't be retarded. The posters make their own beds and lie in them.Elrod said:Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.
Elrod said:Or you give them their own retarded sub-forum, where they proclaim themselves King.
It's not my logic, it's Jack's... he was the first one to "explain" it to me.Sarek said:your logic regarding pwnage
Elrod said:It's not my logic, it's Jack's... he was the first one to "explain" it to me.
Sarek, you need to learn to keep more than one statement in your mind at a time. By jack's logic, replying to someone's post constitutes "pwnage," therefore, in your interpretation, by that logic, following jack into his forum to reply to him constitutes "pwnage."Sarek said:That still doesn't negate the fact that YOU followed HIM here.
jack said:Did it scare you when Messenger said he had posted your phone number in the "secret forum"?
Alex Buchet said:Sarek, you need to learn to keep more than one statement in your mind at a time. By jack's logic, replying to someone's post constitutes "pwnage," therefore, in your interpretation, by that logic, following jack into his forum to reply to him constitutes "pwnage."
This logic is, on its face, ridiculous. When I, or Elrod, or someone who isn't nuts employs it, the intention is farce.
Got it?