Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

So much for progress...

Captain Jack said:
You obviously don't know how EI works. Hell, not even EI knows how EI works.

1 warning-->suspension? WTF?

You received two warnings, on the 21st and 26th of July. That was why you were suspended as per the current guidelines.
 
Godeskian said:
You received two warnings, on the 21st and 26th of July. That was why you were suspended as per the current guidelines.

WHO CARES , YOU FUCKERS SUCK SHIT COVERED COCK.
 
Lover of Purple said:
You are NOT suspended. I'm not sure where that idea came from, but it is wrong.

So, NOPE CAPTAIN JACK (SPIDEY) IS NOT SUSPENDED.

can you unban me then?
 
I got a warning for this?

She was lying. I didn't coin that phrase. I don't know who did. I never called her that here either. But I guess it's okay to overlook her calling people here "Baffoons, gnats, trolls", and other derogatory names all over a particular thread that was recently locked. She intentionally trolled me relentlessly, even taking things from other places. I see no integrity there. It is unfortunate that she had to recieve a suspension, and I'm not going to gloat not one bit. I wish things worked out better in all of this.

So, its not okay for me to defend myself from some one who was IN FACT lying, but it's just fine for her to call people names REPEATEDLY and not get a single warning for it? GiGi said I was lying, where was her warning? Not that I want her to get one, but this is pure bullshit! Fuck this.
 
Godeskian said:
You received two warnings, on the 21st and 26th of July. That was why you were suspended as per the current guidelines.

Lover of Purple said:
You are NOT suspended. I'm not sure where that idea came from, but it is wrong.

So, NOPE CAPTAIN JACK (SPIDEY) IS NOT SUSPENDED.

Sounds like you two need to get on the same page.
 
Captain Jack said:

Okay, try not to kill me here...

But it was edited--it was a misunderstanding, remember? G1223 or somebody made the thugs comment, or whatever it was, and you said GiGi said it, and she got pissed off, and you went back and fixed it (once you realized it was G), so she changed her posts (within maybe a couple of hours), I think. I mostly remember because I was in the thread and going 'say WHAT?' I don't blame GiGi for getting mad about that, or for changing her post once it was cleared up, especially since you apologized to her.

Nor do I blame you for getting pissed about the last warning. That's two warnings in six months--if LoP's correct (and I'm assuming he is ;) ), you don't have a third...?
 
Anakam said:
Okay, try not to kill me here...

Anakam, I'd rather hug you, than kill you. :)

But it was edited--it was a misunderstanding, remember? G1223 or somebody made the thugs comment, or whatever it was, and you said GiGi said it, and she got pissed off, and you went back and fixed it (once you realized it was G), so she changed her posts (within maybe a couple of hours), I think. I mostly remember because I was in the thread and going 'say WHAT?' I don't blame GiGi for getting mad about that, or for changing her post once it was cleared up, especially since you apologized to her.

Nor do I blame you for getting pissed about the last warning. That's two warnings in six months--if LoP's correct (and I'm assuming he is ;) ), you don't have a third...?

[/quote]

That is correct, it was a misunderstand, and it was a mistake on my part. I read GiGi's post, and then G1223's, but GiGi's name stuck in my head. She said:

"You are a liar."

in response to my err. Then, because of you (thanks BTW :)), I realized I made a boo-boo, fixed my error, and apologized to GiGi ASAP. She then edited her post because (as was said in her edit) it was resolved. I don't blame GiGi one bit for saying what she did because, honestly, I would have done the same IMHO. And I don't blame her for editing the post since it was resolved. And I don't want to get her into trouble in any way about that. What I am saying is, during that time when the original post was up, no one had a problem with her calling some one a liar, and/or using the word "liar" to another member.

In any case, the post was edited, and I can't use it as an example any more which is perhaps for the best anyway. I'd rather move on than dwell on things like this. :)

Thanks Anakam. :)

P.S. I also messed up and misread eryn's post. My bad. Then Gode added that I was suspended, and it confused me more. Oh well...

P.P.S. That's 2 warnings in ONE WEEK for me. Six more months to lay low now. :(
 
Captain Jack said:
P.S. I also messed up and misread eryn's post. My bad. Then Gode added that I was suspended, and it confused me more. Oh well...

Yeah sorry about that, with two warnings in one week I assumed you had been suspended. I should learn not to assume things.
 
Godeskian said:
Yeah sorry about that, with two warnings in one week I assumed you had been suspended. I should learn not to assume things.
Fuck it. Warn him about something to make it 3 and ban the boy pirate for a week.
 
Top