Well I'll play:
According to the CIA World Fact Book, 33% of the population of Singapore is Buddhist, 18% is Christian, and 14% is Muslim. So it would seem that GTurner is right and Anna's example of a tidy Muslim country is false.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sn.html
Also, the population of Saudi Arabia is around 28 million (same source). Not particularly populace, when you parse by population.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2119.html#sa
I can see why you guys banned him. Facts are kind of an inconvenient truth to your beliefs.
They are
bent on defending a viciously oppressive, brutally violent theocracy from any criticism.
Womens' rights? Liberals don't believe in them, not when Islam is violating them.
Minority rights? Liberals don't believe in them, not when Islam is violating them.
Here's what liberals
do believe in: the destruction of western civilization -- by which should be understood
actual civilization -- and everything else can be thrown by the way-side.
As a woman, under Islamic hegemony, Anna would be
forced to stop driving, stop voting, stop
reading, stop working, stop speaking to men she doesn't know; she could not associate with whom she likes, work where she likes, pursue a romantic relationship with whom she likes, could forfeit her very
life for refusing unwanted romantic or sexual advances.
Does that bother her? Apparently, it absolutely does not. She is committed to defending this bronze-age religion from criticism, even at the peril of
her own freedom and her very life. Because "racism."