Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

United 93

The film is a simple propaganda piece. Full of the same lies and obfuscations as the actual event. You realize what the film was stating when the pilot put those two pictures on the cockpit dashboard?

Anyway, it's going to be fun having a democratic congress this fall, and starting impeachment procedings against the criminal admin that perpetrated this sick event.
 
What's comforting about all of this is the lockstep of the fascists. At least it's predictable.
 
Well, I haven't seen it but I don't think I would be interested in it anyway. I'm pretty much in the habit of asking the same questions as Messenger these days.
 
jack said:
The film is a simple propaganda piece. Full of the same lies and obfuscations as the actual event. You realize what the film was stating when the pilot put those two pictures on the cockpit dashboard?

Anyway, it's going to be fun having a democratic congress this fall, and starting impeachment procedings against the criminal admin that perpetrated this sick event.

Um, impeachment for what, exactly? Unlike wick-dippin' Clinton, President Bush committed no crime. It'll be fun watching the Dems try to come up with some trumped-up charges. :bigass:
 
jack said:
The film is a simple propaganda piece. Full of the same lies and obfuscations as the actual event. You realize what the film was stating when the pilot put those two pictures on the cockpit dashboard?

Anyway, it's going to be fun having a democratic congress this fall, and starting impeachment procedings against the criminal admin that perpetrated this sick event.

It has to hurt to be as stupid as you are.
 
Big Dick McGee said:
Um, impeachment for what, exactly? Unlike wick-dippin' Clinton, President Bush committed no crime. It'll be fun watching the Dems try to come up with some trumped-up charges. :bigass:

It must hurt to be as stupid as you are.

But then, you have online sex with the sleaziest slut on the board, so I shouldn't be surprised at the level.
 
If there is a democratic congess elected this fall, the Articles of Impeachment have already been drawn up, Mr Smarty Pants :)
 
Big Dick McGee said:
Um, impeachment for what, exactly? Unlike wick-dippin' Clinton, President Bush committed no crime. It'll be fun watching the Dems try to come up with some trumped-up charges. :bigass:


bush-small.jpg






ROFL
 
jack said:
It must hurt to be as stupid as you are.

But then, you have online sex with the sleaziest slut on the board, so I shouldn't be surprised at the level.

Wait, wait...let me get this straight: You are basically guaranteeing that President Bush will be impeached "when" the Democrats control the House and Senate. You offer no evidence as to why President Bush should be impeached, much less evidence as to why it's "guaranteed" he'll be impeached. And I'm the stupid one?


jack, jack, oh hairless garden gnome...don't you realize that the sum total of all your posts basically equate to, "I know you are but what am I"?

Now GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BBS, YOU JEWISH CUNT.
 
Big Dick McGee said:
Wait, wait...let me get this straight: You are basically guaranteeing that President Bush will be impeached "when" the Democrats control the House and Senate. You offer no evidence as to why President Bush should be impeached, much less evidence as to why it's "guaranteed" he'll be impeached. And I'm the stupid one?


jack, jack, oh hairless garden gnome...don't you realize that the sum total of all your posts basically equate to, "I know you are but what am I"?

Now GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BBS, YOU JEWISH CUNT.

What a fuckin' moron you turned out to be :bigass:
 
Pwnership is like an onion. Once I get them to the racial epithet layer, it's a fucking breeze.
 
Messenger said:
He LIED to start the war. FACT.




thoa048.jpg

That's a fact is it? Well if we can just pull random "facts" out of our asses then I declare that it's a FACT that you're ugly, lonely and still live with your parents and you're pretty fuckin' stupid to boot. FACT!

Prove that Bush lied to start a war with real evidence and and not your stupid ass conspiracy theories and then I will concede that you being mildly retarded isn't a FACT!
 
jack said:
It must hurt to be as stupid as you are.

But then, you have online sex with the sleaziest slut on the board, so I shouldn't be surprised at the level.

Ew gross, BDM likes to online sex it with you?

jack, jack, jack we all know you came here, tried to be a bad ass, got pwned, tried to be an ass kiss, got pwned and now you're trying to be the most popular guy on the board. You're 50, you're a waiter, you're pretty fucking grotesque and you're fighting for popularity on and troll board. Your parents must be so proud.

Here's a clue, YOU'LL NEVER BE SHIT AROUND HERE AND NO ONE LIKES YOU.

:smooch:

God you're a loser.
 
Laker_Girl said:
That's a fact is it? Well if we can just pull random "facts" out of our asses then I declare that it's a FACT that you're ugly, lonely and still live with your parents and you're pretty fuckin' stupid to boot. FACT!
LOL! I wasn't trying to get under your skin but you and BDM are such mental midgets at times that it's astounding.

Prove that Bush lied to start a war with real evidence and and not your stupid ass conspiracy theories and then I will concede that you being mildly retarded isn't a FACT!

OK!


http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/



There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

  • Bush’s long-standing intent to invade Iraq
  • Bush’s willingness to provoke Saddam (in a variety of ways) into providing a pretext for war
  • The fact that the war effectively began with an air campaign nearly a year before the March 2003 invasion and months before Congressional approval for the use of force
  • The administration’s widespread effort to crush dissent and manipulate information that would counter its justification for war
  • The lack of planning for the war’s aftermath and a fundamental lack of understanding of the Iraqi society




Based on extensive interviews with both US investigators and Iraqi scientists, the Washington Post, which pursued an editorial policy in clear support of the war, found that Iraq not only did not possess any of the claimed weapons, but also lacked the material conditions to even create them. Its scientific institutions and factories had been “thoroughly beaten down by 12 years of conflict, arms embargo and strangling economic sanctions,†the Post found.


http://whatreallyhappened.com/WMDlies.html









2829164_75cb363812.jpg


Yum!
 
Top