Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS, Al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood, and...

Either way you become what you hate in order to stop someone from acting like you.

Might be time for some evolution.
 
Its the dichotomy of humanity, a far bigger issue than can be resolved with a nuke, but at least we can prevent deaths while we debate it and seek to work within the chaos it brings to our illusory, dominating and delusional 'order' over chaos ... by failure of initial design - it works not

The purpose of this conference will be to reflect upon the traditional, 'classical' dilemmas and taxonomies in the philosophy of human rights, in the light of recent developments in theories of rights and in the international law of human rights. We all have been taught, and have taught, a number of traditional dichotomies that have been entrenched in theories of human rights for a number of decades: moral versus legal, positive versus negative, first-generation versus second- (and third- ) generation; vertical (against the state) versus horizontal (against other citizens); universal versus relative (or particular); judicially-enforced versus legislatively-protected, etc. Have these dichotomies retained their validity and only the circumstances of their practical applications been altered or have they outgrown their validity altogether?

There have been important developments in the philosophy of human rights and in the international law of human rights, both of which may shed a new light on the dilemmas encapsulated by these (and other) dichotomies.
News | The University of Sydney
Click to expand...
 
In the aftermath of a conflict, peace and justice are often seen to be in direct tension. Demands for justice and legal accountability can be an obstacle to peace, since peace accords may involve compromises with war criminals and human rights perpetrators. The peace versus justice debate therefore translates into a conceptual struggle between conflict resolution and human rights advocacy. In Afghanistan, peace and conflict are often seen as inherently conflicting. Justice, it is often argued, must wait until security has been established. Rather than punishing the perpetrators of past war crimes, the Karzai government has accommodated some of the most notorious warlords, by appointing them to some government positions. While it was long thought that this would have a stabilizing effect, this paper argues that the policy of relying on Afghanistan's warlords-cum-politicians has failed to bring lasting security, peace and stability to the country. This paper presents a brief foray into the field of peace and transitional justice in a fragmented 21st century Afghanistan.
Click to expand...
Peace versus Justice: A False Dichotomy? Mapping Tensions and Complementarities between Conflict Resolution and Human Rights Advocacy in Afghanistan | Merkel | Journal of Conflictology
 
Whatever you have to tell yourself, Killa.

You justify your position same as they do, righteousness. And your answer is death. Same as theirs. You're the same.

You should stop congratulating yourself on the righteousness your _opinion_, because that's what it is, and look for a way to evolve.

I know you won't but I don't really have anything to do at the moment so I thought I'd throw it out there for the fuck of it.
 
I never claimed I was any different, I am quite open about my war mongering. perhaps evolution is in fact tied to self-actualisation which cannot occur while base survival is threatened/compromised :smfhuh:
 
If you had even bothered to check the link you would have seen I was linking to a journal for the science of peace ...


The Journal of Conflictology is an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed open access journal on conflict resolution. Based on the conviction that non-violence is an effective means to wage conflict, it promotes non-violence both as a method of conflict resolution as well as a strategy of handling conflict.

The journal examines the application of conflict resolution theories and provides knowledge on the practice of non-violence through a realistic and scientific approach.

Contributions published at the journal share the results of original scientific research.

Edited at the Open University of Catalonia (UOC) in Barcelona by an international editorial board, Conflictology embraces a global focus on conflict and peace-making and aims to publish contributions which can be read by nonspecialists, academic experts and practitioners alike.

It encourages a wide conception of peace, while focusing on the ways and means of conflict resolution. As an interdisciplinary journal, Conflictology invites contributions from a broad range of traditions that address theories and practice of nonviolence, conflict resolution and peacebuilding; submissions may address theories of non-violence, theories regarding the development and transformation of conflicts, theories of practice, descriptions of the experience of practice, as well as the evaluation of practice. Articles can include policy briefings, review articles, comments and interviews.
Click to expand...

The point I am making is sometimes peace leads to war, even for the non-violent conflictologogists
 
'Gear said:
If you murder to prevent murder, guess what...
Click to expand...

Don't hand us that equivalence shit. Stopping ISIS is stopping slavery, rape, crucifixion, beheadings of children.

They're not killing to survive, they're killing to conquer, enslave, and destroy. They are the fucking Nazis of the 21st century, all the way down from the 11th. There is zero equivalence.
 
That is exactly right Ya Saint. IS kicking up a shit and pretending to behead some american journo who is known to be sympathetic to the assad regime and last known whereabouts was with them and now shows in a stunt video which supports the assad/russia agenda in the region, which blames the US for the syrian war and condemns them for preventing genocide; who are also standing over Israel making them do all kinds of shit or threatening them with hezb or gaza, Israel - by force actually works with IS, Assad, Russia, China, Egypt. So all those who claim to allow the continuation of genocide of christians, druze and other minorities are ignoring the bloodshed caused by their own hand, which has been happening for decades and generations with the west standing back like it always has and supporting these fucking monsters.

The argument for IS to leave them and back off from protecting minorities is the assad agenda and all who support it are his supporters. A day of reckoning is coming and weather Americans like it or not, the US has already been supporting the defense of these minorities, along with UK and EU. Most likely that fucking IS journo vid was not even real, its typical assad regime behavior, manufactured terrorism, compromising foreigners - its a regime of fucking cowardice and all who support it deserve their fucking delusion, including those right wing 'christian' freaks in the US who keep voting for this shit
 
'Gear said:
Oh look, the writer has it all figured out! Watch out for the Nazis writer man!

LOL
Click to expand...

Shariah is fascism, distinguishable only from the shit the Nazis believed in only by virtue of the fact that it treats women even worse. The rest of it, including draping that fascist ideology with superficial religious trappings and ceremonies? Nazism note for fucking note.
 
The Saint said:
Shariah is fascism, distinguishable only from the shit the Nazis believed in only by virtue of the fact that it treats women even worse. The rest of it, including draping that fascist ideology with superficial religious trappings and ceremonies? Nazism note for fucking note.
Click to expand...

Well hey, I have an idea - Post it on TK and get exactly shit done!
 
'Gear said:
Well hey, I have an idea - Post it on TK and get exactly shit done!
Click to expand...

You could say that about anything and everything that gets posted to any message board ever. As copouts go, that was as lame as every other wet turd that oozes down the front of your mind. Stupid pedo.
 
It's simple really - Just clarify what's pornographic about my av, collect your win and proceed to glory.

Unless you're too stupid.

Go ahead 'The Saint' - Let's see what you've got...
 
'Gear said:
It's simple really - Just clarify what's pornographic about my av, collect your win and proceed to glory.

Unless you're too stupid.

Go ahead 'The Saint' - Let's see what you've got...
Click to expand...


Your sickness isn't the topic of this thread, simple pedo bastard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top