“Just don’t watch.”
That’s fine - and people shouldn’t. If someone genuinely dislikes the direction NuTrek has taken, they shouldn’t be paying a subscription and helping prop up a guaranteed viewership floor for something they don’t support. That’s the only signal that actually matters.
What really rankles is the claim that “it might not be for you anymore” or that it’s simply “evolved.” Bollocks. It’s not evolution - it’s substitution. Imagine a sequel to
90210 or
One Tree Hill that deliberately moved away from messy, relationship-driven drama and reinvented itself as a measured, idea-driven adult series.
Or, for a more extreme example, a
Friends sequel that ditches the original premise entirely in favour of a straight procedural courtroom drama, with Lisa Kudrow popping in occasionally after Phoebe discovers a late-in-life talent as a legal whiz (

). You’d see exactly the same outcry from fans as you do with
Starfleet Academy. Eggs even said upthread that it helps not to think of it as a Star Trek show (or words to that effect) - which somewhat proves the point.
Ugh. I was quite content ignoring Trek after the
Picard S3 memberberry bukkake. I regret showing as much interest in this as I have. I feel a bit icky plugging back into this stupid, divisive fandom crap.
At any rate, whatever your stance, it's likely to fizzle out in the near future regardless. Kurtzman era will likely wrap with SFA S2, then they take another swing at the theatrical. A fresh lick of paint emphasizing action and humor, and it'll probably underperform.
That said, I still enjoy Trek via reaction channels - there are a couple currently in the thick of
DS9 S3, which I’m having fun watching.