Random said:That's an awfully cynical view you've got there MM. Still, you're entitled to that if you want. Seems like an awfull lot of folks would be expected to have held their tongues for a long time though.
Not necessarly. Early WD could have done a good job, while the later ones fell asleep at their posts. And new WD could miss stuff that was said long ago, before their "term" in office.
But, I agree with the notion that the whole way they elect Watchdogs is rotten. I suggested as such about a year ago, only to be resoundly ridiculed and labeled a troublemaker.