Kerb Crawler said:Agreed. BUT, it's hard enough living your own life, much less worrying about what somebody else is doing, or holding somebody up to your criteria of a true and just, disciplined life.
Of course not, but you're comparing sicko, fucked-up apples to half-baked, mellow oranges (that shouldn't operate heavy machinery).
proteon said:I have been stoned virtually every day since 1987. I'm not sure if your asking what the allure is Jack because you don't smoke it, you know someone who does and dont' understand or you are just looking for various opinions on the drug.
I'll quickly tell you it's appeal: I did not end up an evil drunk like so many have. I do not dry heave in the morning or tremble, and my skin will never grow yellow. Statistically speaking the likelihood of me killing someone with a vehicle, beating someone to death over a domestic dispute, setting fire to a building, sinking a boat, taking my life in a moment of rage, allienating anyone whoever loved me and dying of liver cancer are phenomenally lower than those of you who have been drunk every day since 1987.
jack said:How would you know pot's long term effects?
You wouldn't, because there's no impartial evidence to support your claim. And I'm especially not interested in you trotting out "evidence" from people you happen to agree with. There won't be an argument over this. Since you don't use it at all, you aren't qualified to offer an opinion as fact.
There are many many many double blind AMA studies showing marijuana's excellent medical applications. Need links? Would be happy to spam a threadful. I was part of a successful 12 year Canadian study which proves that THC in soluble form is an effective treatment for high IntraOcular Pressure. The chemotherapy studies that are now in their 22nd year show statistically that when marijuana is smoked after any kind of chemo, the response rate to the chemo is much higher, in fact the whole cancer survival rate that shows an upward trend can more often than not be traced to marijana consumption after chemo. I certainly don't need your acknowledgement or approval to embrace this as fact.
Mandi said:I gotta go shopping with my sister, i'm gonna need it.....plus we have to go slip and slide over the mountain with no chains or studded tires........
The Question said:And I don't know what y'all have been told, but pot does have long-term effects. Get temporarily stupid deep enough, and often enough, and sooner or later it ain't temporary anymore. Same thing with alcohol.
jack said:How would you know pot's long term effects?
You wouldn't, because there's no impartial evidence to support your claim. And I'm especially not interested in you trotting out "evidence" from people you happen to agree with. There won't be an argument over this. Since you don't use it at all, you aren't qualified to offer an opinion as fact.
There are many many many double blind AMA studies showing marijuana's excellent medical applications. Need links? Would be happy to spam a threadful. I was part of a successful 12 year Canadian study which proves that THC in soluble form is an effective treatment for high IntraOcular Pressure. The chemotherapy studies that are now in their 22nd year show statistically that when marijuana is smoked after any kind of chemo, the response rate to the chemo is much higher, in fact the whole cancer survival rate that shows an upward trend can more often than not be traced to marijana consumption after chemo. I certainly don't need your acknowledgement or approval to embrace this as fact.
proteon said:This is like watching blind folks wrestle. None of you have a fucking leg to stand on other than alleged studies and links.
I am the only empiricist here apparently. Thus I must be ignored at all costs.
Simmer down reactionary.
We don't use it because we are aware of it's effects.
Right there in your own example, you are touting evidence that agrees with your point of view. And your saying that we can't use evidence that agrees with ours?
Put the bong down for three hours before you try and argue.